LS youre struggling, aren't you. you can't gainsay the statistical evidence so you just blunder into abuse. youre more intelligent than that, so why sink to it?
give us some reasoned arguments. tell us, for instance, what keith bradley's voting/speech/attendance/written questions/local surgery record was, so we can see how much more diligent he was than john.
Or tell us the average mp's record, so we can see how far john falls below average.
You can't, can you!
John Leech is an exceptionally diligent MP, whether you like his politics or not, and you can't bring any coherent argument against that to the table other than shouting liar over something from 3 years ago.
That really makes john's case for him. As I think you know perfectly well.
